A Tax-Efficient Retirement Withdrawal Strategy: 3 Decisions That Can Matter More Than Investment Picks
A Tax-Efficient Retirement Withdrawal Strategy: 3 Decisions That Can Matter More Than Investment Picks
Most people think a financial advisor's biggest value shows up in the investments they pick.
And investments certainly matter. You can build a portfolio poorly or just neglect your investments so it is not setup for your needs. You can take too much risk. You can actually, depending on your goals and risk tolerance, take too little risk, or be tax -inefficient. But for most wealthy investors and retirees, the planning around investments is not going to be the highest and most impactful conversation for their finances because they have often already done really well investing and building a nest egg.
Sure, there may be some tweaks and optimizations that an advisor might suggest even for wealthy investors and retirees.
But once you have built up a meaningful amount of savings, there are other decisions that can become just as important.
They come down to three things:
Where your money is saved
The order you take money out
How you manage taxes across retirement
These decisions are all connected.
And two people with very similar portfolios and very similar investment returns can end up with very different tax situations depending on how their money is structured and how they use it once they retire.
This is really what a tax-efficient retirement withdrawal strategy is about.
It is not just trying to pay less in taxes this year. It is looking at how all of these decisions work together over the next 10, 20, or 30 years.
Retirement Planning Changes Once You Start Taking Money Out
For most of your working life, the goal is pretty straightforward.
You earn money. You save some of it. You invest it. And ideally, you allow it to grow over a long period of time.
Retirement changes the problem.
Now you need to figure out how to turn those savings back into income.
And that brings up a different set of questions.
Should you take money from your brokerage account?
Should you take money from a traditional IRA?
Should you use Roth money?
Should you convert some of your IRA to Roth before you actually need it?
And what happens to your taxes when Social Security, required distributions, investment income, and everything else eventually start stacking on top of each other?
This is where simply looking at your total account balance doesn't tell you the whole story.
Decision #1: Where Is Your Retirement Money Saved?
The first decision is how your savings are structured.
Not just how much you have, but where you have it.
Most retirees will have some combination of three types of money:
Pre-tax retirement accounts. These might include a traditional 401(k) or IRA. You generally received a tax benefit while contributing to these accounts, but withdrawals are generally taxable later.
Roth accounts. You don't receive the same upfront tax deduction, but qualified Roth distributions can generally come out tax-free.
Taxable brokerage accounts. These work differently again. You may owe taxes on dividends, interest, or gains when investments are sold, but the entire account is not treated as ordinary taxable income when money comes out.
None of these three accounts is automatically better than the others.
The value is having options.
Suppose one retiree has $3 million and almost all of it is sitting in a traditional IRA and 401(k).
Another retiree also has $3 million, but some is pre-tax, some is Roth, and some is in a brokerage account.
They may have the exact same amount of money.
But the second person has more places to pull from depending on what their tax situation looks like in a particular year.
That flexibility becomes important once you start spending the money.
Decision #2: Which Retirement Account Should You Withdraw From First?
This leads directly into the second decision.
Which account should you actually use first?
There is no withdrawal order that works perfectly for everybody.
You might hear general rules like spending taxable money first, then traditional retirement accounts, and saving Roth money until later.
Sometimes that makes sense.
Sometimes it doesn't.
The right decision depends on what else is happening in your plan that year.
How much income do you already have?
Have you started Social Security?
Do you have capital gains?
Are you trying to stay within a particular tax bracket?
Are you on Medicare?
Do you have a large purchase coming up?
Are required minimum distributions going to become a problem later?
This is why I don't think about retirement withdrawals as something you set once and then never look at again.
The answer can change from year to year.
Maybe one year you deliberately take more from a traditional IRA because your taxable income is unusually low.
Maybe another year you use Roth money because you already have a lot of taxable income and don't want to add more.
Or maybe you realize gains from a brokerage account because you have room to do it at an attractive tax rate.
The account you use affects your income.
Your income affects your taxes.
And those taxes can affect what makes sense to do next.
Decision #3: Think About Taxes Over Your Entire Retirement
This brings us to the third decision.
Most people naturally think about taxes one year at a time.
You file your return. You see what you owe. Then you start over again next year.
Retirement tax planning needs to look much further ahead.
Suppose you retire at 62.
Your paycheck stops.
Maybe Social Security hasn't started yet.
And required minimum distributions might still be many years away.
That period can create a very important planning window.
Your taxable income may be lower than it was while you were working, which could give you an opportunity to deliberately move money from a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA through partial Roth conversions.
You pay taxes on the conversion today.
But in exchange, that money is no longer sitting inside the traditional IRA potentially creating taxable distributions later.
For someone born in 1960 or later, current rules generally set the applicable RMD age at 75.
That can leave a fairly long window between retirement and required distributions.
The goal isn't automatically to convert as much as possible.
It is to figure out how much makes sense.
A conversion creates taxable income. That can push you into a higher tax bracket. It can also affect Medicare premiums.
So the question is not:
“How can I pay the least amount of tax this year?”
A better question is:
“What decisions give me the best tax position across my retirement?”
Those are two very different questions.
These Three Decisions Work Together
This is where retirement planning starts to become more interesting.
These decisions don't happen separately.
Your withdrawal strategy affects your taxable income.
Your taxable income affects how much room you might have for a Roth conversion.
A Roth conversion affects the amount left in your traditional IRA.
That can affect your future required minimum distributions.
And your income can also affect what you pay for Medicare.
Medicare's income-related premium adjustments generally use tax information from two years earlier. For example, 2026 Medicare premiums are generally based on 2024 tax information.
So something you do today can show up in another part of your financial picture years later.
That is why looking at each decision by itself can miss a lot.
A good retirement income plan treats them as one system.
A Simple Example: $3.4 Million Saved Almost Entirely Pre-Tax
Let's look at a hypothetical example based on the type of planning situations we regularly see.
Assume we have a married couple who are both around 61.
They have done extremely well.
They spent decades working, saving, and maximizing their retirement plans. Now they have approximately $3.4 million accumulated for retirement.
There is just one issue.
Almost all of the money is pre-tax.
I wouldn't say they made a mistake.
They did exactly what many successful employees are told to do for most of their careers. They saved consistently, received tax deductions along the way, and built a substantial retirement portfolio.
Now the planning problem has changed.
Every time they take money from those traditional retirement accounts, those withdrawals can create taxable income.
If they need money for normal spending, it is taxable.
If they need an extra $50,000 or $60,000 for a large purchase, that can mean another large taxable withdrawal.
Eventually, required distributions can begin forcing money out whether they actually need to spend it or not.
So instead of waiting until that happens, we can start looking at the years immediately following retirement.
Their earned income has stopped.
Required minimum distributions haven't started.
This may give us an opportunity to complete partial Roth conversions during those lower-income years.
Not all at once.
And not blindly.
We can model different amounts each year and look at the tax brackets, Medicare implications, future account values, expected spending, and future required distributions.
In the hypothetical analysis used for this example, making partial Roth conversions over that planning window produced approximately $180,000 in projected lifetime tax savings compared with leaving the original structure unchanged.
That isn't a guarantee, and it isn't a result everyone should expect.
Change the tax rates, returns, spending, conversion amounts, life expectancy, or other assumptions and the result changes too.
The important point is what created the difference.
It wasn't finding a better investment.
It wasn't predicting the market.
It was changing the way the accounts were structured and when the taxes were being paid.
Roth Money Can Also Create Flexibility
There is another reason this matters beyond lifetime tax projections.
It gives the couple another place to get money when real life happens.
Let's say a few years into retirement they decide to help a child with a down payment.
Maybe they need $60,000.
If every dollar they own is inside a traditional IRA, getting the $60,000 they actually want to spend may require creating additional taxable income.
But if they have built a Roth balance, a qualified Roth distribution can generally be taken without adding that withdrawal to taxable income.
That gives them another option.
This is why I think about Roth planning as more than simply comparing today's tax rate with some future tax rate.
It can also be about control.
You don't know exactly what retirement is going to look like 10 years from now.
Having different types of accounts gives you more ways to respond when something changes.
What About Medicare?
Medicare is another reason these decisions need to be coordinated.
Higher income can cause some Medicare beneficiaries to pay additional premiums through IRMAA.
And importantly, Roth conversions themselves increase taxable income.
So it would be wrong to say that doing Roth conversions automatically lowers your Medicare premiums.
A large conversion could actually increase them.
The planning question is whether paying some additional tax—or potentially higher Medicare premiums—in one period could put you in a better position later by reducing the amount left in pre-tax accounts and potentially reducing future required distributions.
Again, you have to look at both sides.
This is exactly why we don't want to make the Roth decision by itself.
Isn't This What My CPA Does?
This is a question I hear quite a bit.
A good CPA can be an extremely important part of the process.
Some CPAs are also very proactive about tax planning.
But financial planning brings another perspective because we are looking at the tax decision alongside everything else going on in your life.
How much are you spending?
When should Social Security start?
Where are you taking money from?
What does your investment allocation look like?
Are you on Medicare?
What happens to your surviving spouse?
What do your accounts look like 10 or 20 years from now?
The tax return is one part of that picture.
Ideally, your financial planner and CPA are working together rather than trying to replace one another.
Do You Need $3 Million for This to Matter?
No.
The numbers in our example are larger because they make the impact easy to see.
But the same structural issue can exist with $500,000, $700,000, $1 million, or another amount entirely.
Someone could have $700,000 saved almost entirely pre-tax and still need to answer the same questions.
Where should their retirement income come from?
Should they complete Roth conversions?
When should they start Social Security?
How will future required distributions affect them?
The dollar amounts change.
The planning process doesn't.
The Bigger Retirement Question
Once you've spent 20 or 30 years building your retirement savings, it is easy to keep focusing on the investments.
What funds should I own?
Should I change my allocation?
What is the market doing?
Those questions still matter.
But as you get closer to retirement, I would add three more:
Where is my money saved?
What order should I use it in?
And what could my tax situation look like 10 or 20 years from now?
If those questions have never really been mapped out, there could be planning opportunities sitting inside an otherwise very well-built retirement plan.
The goal isn't to find some perfect tax strategy.
It is to understand the choices you have before retirement starts making some of those choices for you.
If you've accumulated meaningful retirement savings and want to better understand how your pre-tax, Roth, and taxable accounts could work together, you can schedule a conversation with Parkmount Financial Partners to review your situation.
Comments